Bread Loaf 2017 Part III: Evaluations
I have made a couple posts about the emotional and professional impact that Bread Loaf 2017 has had on me, but I also realize that I have missed out on describing the event in detail. I welcome you to now peruse the responses I put on the official evaluation form last week.
What did you like about the workshop?
I liked that the workshop had a mix of different genres. While I workshopped poetry for this workshop, the fact that other people translated prose had an impact on me, because I can take that back when I translate my own prose. And yet there is more to it than that. I think the fact that we had a mixed genre gave us different views about to approach our translations, and while I say it has been helpful for me, I hope that it was also helpful for others. The group was accepting and warm, but also one that could give meaningful feedback that was carefully construed. The fact that we were a mix of languages too helped us immensely. As a firm believer in the idea that languages teach you how to think in diverse ways, it was a joy to work with people who all had such different thoughts in their heads.
What about the workshop might have been better?
I would have liked to have more time with the people in my workshop. I feel that it is a talented group of people to work with, and yet we had so little time with one another we didn’t quite get into the swing of things where we were comfortable enough to express ourselves in a way that I think caused a disadvantage towards the others. I think we could also benefit from something that another workshop group in Orion that I heard about where everyone had to read and comment a minimum of one sentence about each member’s piece so that we could be on common ground. Another thing that my workshop and I talked about is the idea of everyone writing an accompaniment to our pieces describing what the touchstones are and what we think about our works and our writers.
- ways for us to articulate what the traction was for the piece
- explain what the project means to the translator, and to the literary world.
- what we are hoping to discuss about the piece
- what we know we don’t know.
Which lectures did you attend, and where they useful?
Unfortunately, I was ill for a portion of the conference and the only lecture I attended was Idra Novey’s “Writing While Translating.” I thought that this lecture was fantastic. After having gone to this lecture I gained a much better sense of self and sense of comfort in the idea that I am both a writer and a translator. Her advice also about switching genres and going from translation to our own work has allowed me to conceptualize the fact that I don’t need to compartmentalize the different sides of myself.
Which classes/talks/panels did you attend, and were they useful?
I attended the panel “On Publishing Literary Translation” with Elaina Ellis, Tynan Kogane, Fiona McCrae, and Michael Z. Wise which I thought gave a great deal of useful advice for the publication of books in translation, but I feel left a gap in terms of what journal publishing is like, which Idra stressed to us as also being equally if not more important.
Contrastively I loved the talk “Contracts and Copyright.” with Chad W. Post because I feel that it filled in many of the gaps left by the panel, and the systematic way that he broke everything down for us was both instructive and insightful, and he took to heart what the audience had to say and what they wanted to know, which is the same case with the panel, however that was a little less organized since they thought they would have a moderator and without one everyone in the room was caught a bit off-guard I think, which set the tone a bit lower than it otherwise might have been.
The class I went to, “Translation Heresies” was excellent for many reasons, but mostly because Christopher Merrill has such a vibrant presence it would be hard not to enjoy a class put on by him. The way that he talked about translating languages one does not know was fascinating, and has inspired me to try the same in the future once I have a more stable career and a project that I am truly engaged in.
What did you think of the Bread Loafer Readings?
I absolutely adored these readings. Hearing so many voices, from the translators’ conference and Orion both together was an amazing experience because these fields may seem distant, but when 18 people each go up and share what they have to say it both brings in a focus and tells us all that we are much more similar than we might think. I did a reading, and while I do have some experience with public speaking I still found myself shaking and suffering from imposter syndrome something fierce because how could I compare to the amazing things other people have done and said? But after I spoke and the readings that day were done I had people tell me that they liked the job I had done with my translation and poem and throughout the days after people were talking about my work, each time reassuring me that I had a place in this community.
How were your editor meetings?
My editor meetings were excellent! I had an individual meeting with Michael Z. Wise, and while I am early on in my project he gave me a great deal of advice as to how to advance my work on Sor Juana beyond just writing my thesis and how I can build myself up as someone just now starting in the field, and overall, he was very helpful, being that he not only had knowledge but was also supportive and friendly.
My group meeting was with Chad W. Post and he went into much more detail than at the talk (previously discussed above) telling us about his work and how our work can be built up. He showed interest in everyone’s projects and in helping us move forward with them, taking time to speak with all of us equally and with sharp ideas.
Please comment on the special programing, such as the bird walks, music night, and Frost picnic.
I did not go to any of these events, because I slept in most days until breakfast, went to bed early the night we had music and since the rescheduled Frost Picnic occurred during one of my editor meetings I did not go.
What did you think about the food, dining room, and kitchen?
Everything about them was fabulous. The food was not only superb, but their willingness to work with dietary restrictions was unparalleled when compared to eating anywhere but my own home, and the cooking was far above my skill level. The staff and chefs were all kind and helpful, and truly delightful people all-around. The dining room was spotless, despite all the people who were there and the kitchen was very sanitary. I thought overall it was the best I have eaten in a while. I also appreciate the ready availability of water and other beverages.
Did the Wi-Fi work for you? If not, what problems did you encounter?
Yes, however as a college student I was using eduroam, as opposed to what the rest of the conference was working with.
Where did you stay, and how were your accommodations?
I stayed in the inn itself, and it was a very convenient and comfortable location, especially since it rained many times and I didn’t need to get caught in it to get breakfast. The room was consistently a comfortable temperature, the sheets were clean, blankets and towels were soft, I had no complaints. I additionally found that the key codes on the doors were genius because it meant that if I remembered the numbers I never needed to worry about locking myself out.
Please comment on the stock in the Bread Loaf bookstore. Did you find what you needed? Are there items you would suggest adding?
I only went once, and if was a quick browse. The stock was interesting, but I had very little money so I didn’t buy anything but a snicker’s bar.
We would love to hear your thoughts on the shared campus. What was your experience like sharing the campus with BL Orion?
I loved the shared campus atmosphere. The back and forth between the two conferences as we explored our similarities and our differences was excellent because the slightly shifted perspective allowed us all to learn from one another.
How was the communication leading up to the conference? Do you have any comments for us on the handbook, editor sign-up, and manuscript packet mailings?
I thought that it all covered things well, apart from the fact that we did not get as detailed instructions about what to present with our works and what the works of others would be like since it was not necessarily standardized. As a tiny detail, I think that when the manuscripts are all complied into one PDF there should be an over-arching set of page numbers beyond the individual pieces to make it easier to get on the same page when discussing a work.
How did you hear about the Bread Loaf Translators’ Conference (if you could include some detail here, that would be great)?
I heard about Bread Loaf via a notice in the Comparative Literature and Culture Listserv at Brandeis University. Since I am the Undergraduate Departmental Representative for the program I pay a great deal of attention to everything that gets sent out.
Please list any translation and/or writing groups or organizations in the U.S. or abroad that you belong to or recommend that we get in touch with to help spread the word about the conference.
I am not participating in any other translation writing groups or organizations, it is however my focus of interest at Brandeis University towards both my BA and MA degrees.
What social media do you use most often?
It is a split between Tumblr, blogger, LinkedIn and Facebook. My personal blog is hosted on both Tumblr and blogger. Meanwhile I also use Facebook and LinkedIn regularly, and Instagram and twitter a little less so. I have a snapchat, but I almost never use it.
Would you recommend the conference to a friend?
Yes! I think anyone with an interest in translation would love this conference.
Please take a moment to add any additional comments or suggestions?
There are a few things I would like to suggest for the future:
- Include more people who work with Asian languages, as well as more people who work with indigenous languages to widen the discussion of translation between differing languages and cultures beyond the western world. There were a fair few at this conference, however not as many as those who worked with French or Spanish (including myself). The amount of people working with Spanish outnumbered Amharic, Arabic, Chinese, Haitian Creole, Czech, Danish, Galician, Italian, Japanese, Latin, Norwegian, Russian, Urdu and Yiddish combined. Note that some of those people were in both that language and Spanish, but I am trying to prove a point here. Not that I want you to stop admitting people for Spanish, because that’s my language, but I’m just putting it out there.
- Have people who are editors for journals just as represented and advertised as those for book publishing, as well as similar events.
- A bigger window for breakfast, at least in terms of continental bagels or cereal.
- Less exclusively late-night events. Some people must retire earlier than others, especially those with medical issues.
- An informal yet scheduled time for peer workshopping, possibly by language and cross-workshops.
- It seems short to only have 4 days of workshop to get to know and share with the group, so a longer time frame for the conference would be advantageous.
- Some light classes or talks about translation theory for those in manuscript workshops who are doing less theoretical work as compared to the introductory workshops.
- Discussions of how to choose a good writer and how to identify a project worth publishing.
So there you have it, my full evaluation of Bread Loaf. I hope that you enjoyed my critique of this awesome place.